Patient-Reported Outcome Results From the Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Myeloma X Trial Evaluating Salvage Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE: Salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (sASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after a prior autologous stem-cell transplantation leads to increased remission duration and overall survival. We report a comprehensive study on patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life (QoL) and pain in sASCT. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either sASCT or nontransplantation consolidation (NTC). Pain and QoL were assessed as secondary outcomes using validated QoL instruments (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and myeloma-specific module, QLQ-MY20; the Brief Pain Inventory [Short Form]; and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [Self-Assessment] scale). RESULTS: A total of 288 patients (> 96%) consented to the QoL substudy. The median follow-up was 52 months. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 Global health status scores were higher (better) in the NTC group at 100 days after random assignment (P = .0496), but not at later time points. Pain interference was higher (worse) in the sASCT group than in the NTC group at 6 months after random assignment (P = .0267), with patients with sASCT reporting higher scores for Pain interference with daily living for up to 2 years after random assignment. Patients reporting lower concerns about adverse effects of treatment after sASCT had a time to progression advantage. CONCLUSION: Patients with sASCT with relapsed MM demonstrated a comparative reduction in QoL and greater impact of treatment adverse effects lasting for 6 months and up to 2 years for pain, after which patients who had received sASCT reported better outcomes. Patients who experienced lower adverse effects after sASCT had longer time to progression and overall survival, showing the need to improve symptom management peritransplantation. To our knowledge, this study provides the most comprehensive picture of QoL before and after sASCT in patients with relapsed MM.

Outcome for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma treated with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with or without rituximab; a retrospective, multicentre study.

The treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphoma remains a challenge. Platinum-containing chemotherapy is standard of care. Gemcitabine/oxaliplatin (Gem-Ox) with or without rituximab (R) is an outpatient regimen with a favorable toxicity profile. This retrospective 'real world' study reports outcomes for 44 unselected patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive lymphoma treated with Gem-Ox ± R. 41% had primary refractory disease. The overall response rate (ORR) was 43% with a complete response (CR) of 30%. Response to the prior treatment regimen significantly affected the ORR with only 8% achieving CR if prior remission was <12 months. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was common and 22% had febrile neutropenia. Eight patients proceeded to stem cell transplant. Overall, outcomes remain poor with a median overall survival of 8 months. In this high-risk group of patients, Gem-Ox ± R results in similar responses to other more toxic, inpatient regimens and should therefore be considered as second line therapy in relapsed lymphoma.